golden empire jili download US-Google face off as ad tech antitrust trial comes to close

Billionaires Are Selling NVIDIA and Picking Up This TSX Stock

Pakistani police arrest thousands of Imran Khan supporters ahead of rally in the capitalNone

NoneHere's what to know about the new funding deal that countries agreed to at UN climate talks

Google and the US government faced off in a federal court on Monday, as each side delivered closing arguments in a case revolving around the technology giant's alleged unfair domination of online advertising. The trial in a Virginia federal court is Google's second US antitrust case now under way as the US government tries to rein in the power of big tech. In a separate trial, a Washington judge ruled that Google's search business is an illegal monopoly, and the US Justice Department is asking that Google sell its Chrome browser business to resolve the case. The latest case, also brought by the Justice Department, focuses on ad technology for the open web -- the complex system determining which online ads people see when they surf the internet. The vast majority of websites use a trio of Google ad software products that together, leave no way for publishers to escape Google's advertising technology, the plaintiffs allege. Publishers -- including News Corp and Gannett publishing -- complain that they are locked into Google's advertising technology in order to run ads on their websites. "Google is once, twice, three times a monopolist," DOJ lawyer Aaron Teitelbaum told the court in closing arguments. Presiding judge Leonie Brinkema has said that she would deliver her opinion swiftly, as early as next month. Whatever Brinkema's judgment, the outcome will almost certainly be appealed, prolonging a process that could go all the way to the US Supreme Court. The government alleges that Google controls the auction-style system that advertisers use to purchase advertising space online. The US lawyers argue that this approach allows Google to charge higher prices to advertisers while sending less revenue to publishers such as news websites, many of which are struggling to stay in business. The US argues that Google used its financial power to acquire potential rivals and corner the ad tech market, leaving advertisers and publishers with no choice but to use its technology. The government wants Google to divest parts of its ad tech business. Google dismissed the allegations as an attempt by the government to pick "winners and losers" in a diverse market. The company argues that the display ads at issue are just a small share of today's ad tech business. Google says the plaintiffs' definition of the market ignores ads that are also placed in search results, apps and social media platforms and where, taken as a whole, Google does not dominate. "The law simply does not support what the plaintiffs are arguing in this case," said Google's lawyer Karen Dunn. She warned that if Google were to lose the case, the winners would be rival tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta or Amazon, whose market share in online advertising is ascendant as Google's share is falling. The DOJ countered that it simply "does not matter" that Google is competing in the broader market for online ads. "That is a different question" than the market for ads on websites that is the target of the case, said Teitelbaum. Google also points to US legal precedent, saying arguments similar to the government's have been refuted in previous antitrust cases. Dunn also warned that forcing Google to work with rivals in its ad products would amount to government central planning that the court should reject. If the judge finds Google to be at fault, a new phase of the trial would decide how the company should comply with that conclusion. And all that could be moot if the incoming Trump administration decides to drop the case. The president-elect has been a critic of Google's, but he warned earlier this month that breaking it up could be "a very dangerous thing." arp/dw

NoneABU DHABI, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov 26, 2024-- Der Open-Source AI Summit Abu Dhabi, der vom Technology Innovative Institute (TII), einem globalen Forschungszentrum für angewandte Wissenschaft, veranstaltet wird, hat mit kritischen Gesprächen begonnen, die die globale KI-Agenda prägen werden. Der Summit, der heute und morgen im St. Regis Saadiyat Island stattfindet und an dem über 300 Personen teilnehmen, fällt mit dem wachsenden internationalen Fokus auf die Anziehungs- und Abstoßungskraft zwischen Open- und Closed-Source-KI zusammen. Diese Pressemitteilung enthält multimediale Inhalte. Die vollständige Mitteilung hier ansehen: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241126437075/de/ Abu Dhabi’s Technology Innovation Institute Inaugurates Open-Source AI Summit with Critical Discussions on the Future of AI (Photo: AETOSWire) „Es gibt zwei entscheidende Entscheidungen, wenn es um KI geht“, sagte S.E. Faisal Al Bannai, Generalsekretär des Advanced Technology Research Council und Berater des Präsidenten der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. „Sie können ein Closed-Source-KI-Modell nutzen, das einem Unternehmen gehört. Sie kontrollieren es, einschließlich der Daten, die Sie ihm geben. Innovation beginnt und endet mit ihnen. „Alternativ können Sie ein Open-Source-Modell nutzen, das innerhalb der Gemeinschaft wächst. Wir entwickeln gemeinsam Innovationen, auf die jeder überall zugreifen und aufbauen kann. Wenn KI Teil des Gefüges unserer Gesellschaft sein soll – und das wird sie –, müssen Länder, Unternehmen und Einzelpersonen entscheiden, wer sie kontrolliert. Die Entwicklung der Falcon-KI-Modelle war der Beitrag von TII zur Welt.“ Dr. Najwa Aaraj, Chief Executive Officer von TII, eröffnete den Summit und sagte: „Der Open-Source AI Summit Abu Dhabi ist ein entscheidender Moment für den globalen KI-Diskurs. Wie andere Open-Source-Modelle bringt Falcon Wissenschaftler, Entwickler und Innovatoren zusammen, um technologische Fortschritte zu beschleunigen und so als Katalysator für globale Veränderungen zu wirken. Wir freuen uns darauf, zu sehen, welche Auswirkungen dies weiterhin haben wird, insbesondere im Rahmen unserer weiteren Zusammenarbeit mit der Falcon Foundation.“ Auf der Tagesordnung des Summits standen weiterhin Diskussionen mit renommierten Rednern, darunter Dr. Belgacem Haba, Vice President der Adeia Corporation in den USA, der über die Herausforderungen sprach, die KI in der Halbleiterindustrie mit sich bringt. Prof. Philip Torr, Professor und Chief Scientific Advisor an der Universität Oxford im Vereinigten Königreich, sprach darüber, wem KI gehören sollte, und ging dabei auf potenzielle Nachteile sowie auf die Regulierung ein. Er argumentierte, dass langfristig die Vorteile von Open-Source-KI die Risiken überwiegen. Dr. Hakim Hacid, Chief Researcher des KI-Forschungszentrums von TII, sagte: „Wir glauben, dass Open-Source-KI der richtige Weg ist, aber es ist alles andere als einfach – es gibt Herausforderungen und Fragen zu Kontrolle, Richtlinien, Rechenleistung und Hardware, die wir angehen müssen. Deshalb bringen wir auf diesem Summit so viele internationale Experten zusammen und werden dies auch in den kommenden Jahren in Zusammenarbeit mit der Falcon Foundation tun. Diese Gespräche sind von entscheidender Bedeutung.“ Zu den späteren Rednern gehören Dr. Natalia Vassilieva, Vice President und Field CTO von Cerebras Systems in den USA, Dr. June Paik, Gründerin und CEO von FuriosaAI in den USA, Dr. Armand Joulin, Research Director bei Google DeepMind in Frankreich, und Dr. Michal Valko, Principal Llama Engineer bei Meta Paris in Frankreich. Sie werden über den Grad der Offenheit von KI, nachhaltiges KI-Computing, die Erstellung kompakterer LLMs, die Nutzung von Basismodellen für vertrauenswürdige Algorithmen und vieles mehr sprechen. Dr. Jingwei Zuo von TII wird über Falcon Mamba sprechen, das erste State-Space-Sprachmodell, das auf einer völlig neuen Architektur basiert und Anfang dieses Jahres auf den Markt gebracht wurde. Der Summit wird in einer Podiumsdiskussion unter der Leitung von TII über ihre Vision für Open-Source-KI gipfeln. Die Falcon AI LLM-Serie von TII hat weltweite Anerkennung gefunden. Die Serie begann mit dem Start von Falcon 40B, dem ersten Open-Source-LLM der VAE, im Mai 2023. Seitdem gehören die nachfolgenden Falcon-Modelle durchweg zu den weltweit führenden Open-Source-KI-Modellen, wie die unabhängige Branchenrangliste Hugging Face bestätigt. Ein neues Falcon-Modell wird für Ende 2024 erwartet. *Quelle: AETOSWire Die Ausgangssprache, in der der Originaltext veröffentlicht wird, ist die offizielle und autorisierte Version. Übersetzungen werden zur besseren Verständigung mitgeliefert. Nur die Sprachversion, die im Original veröffentlicht wurde, ist rechtsgültig. Gleichen Sie deshalb Übersetzungen mit der originalen Sprachversion der Veröffentlichung ab. Originalversion auf businesswire.com ansehen: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241126437075/de/ CONTACT: Victoria Meven victoria.meven@edelman.com KEYWORD: UNITED STATES FRANCE UNITED KINGDOM UNITED ARAB EMIRATES NORTH AMERICA EUROPE MIDDLE EAST INDUSTRY KEYWORD: SCIENCE SOFTWARE OTHER SCIENCE RESEARCH HARDWARE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OTHER TECHNOLOGY SOURCE: Technology Innovation Institute Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 11/26/2024 04:55 PM/DISC: 11/26/2024 04:56 PM http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241126437075/de

Canadian freestyle ski star Mikael Kingsbury seeks to extend recordEnphase Energy ENPH has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 12.81% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 26.49%. Currently, Enphase Energy has a market capitalization of $9.57 billion. Buying $1000 In ENPH: If an investor had bought $1000 of ENPH stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $3,238.23 today based on a price of $70.86 for ENPH at the time of writing. Enphase Energy's Performance Over Last 5 Years Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Chipotle Mexican Grill CMG has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 15.31% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 27.16%. Currently, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a market capitalization of $84.76 billion. Buying $100 In CMG: If an investor had bought $100 of CMG stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $3,727.08 today based on a price of $62.20 for CMG at the time of writing. Chipotle Mexican Grill's Performance Over Last 15 Years Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Mead football has put on a defensive masterclass this season, and its efforts have kept it nearly undefeated leading into the Class 3A state semifinals. Its only blemish came during the last week of the regular season against Windsor, which Pomona defeated just last week. Now, the second-seeded Mavericks will face off with No. 3 Pomona for a shot at the state championship. The last time they made an appearance in the title game, in 2021, they lost to Fort Morgan. Now, they have a shot at redemption, but the road won’t be easy. Game details: Saturday, 1 p.m., at Mead High School How Mead can win: Defense, defense, defense. The Mavericks have already shown that they can keep opposing offenses off of the field, and never gave up more than 15 points in a contest before last week’s 34-23 win over No. 7 Pueblo Central. That will be key against a Pomona team that knows how to put up big numbers. How Pomona can win: Keep Mead guessing. The Panthers have proven they can run and throw the ball well, having amassed 2,641 rushing yards and 1,331 passing yards between their two quarterbacks, Tucker Ingersoll and Emmitt Munson. While Munson holds most of the rushing yards with 1,072, he’s far from the only player who can pick up significant yardage. Matchup to watch: Munson vs. Mead’s defense. Last week, the Mavericks held an offensive juggernaut for Pueblo Central, Amari Brown, to just 136 rushing yards. By taking him out of the equation, the Mavericks cruised to victory. They’ll need to do the same for Munson, whether he’s in the pocket or not. To date, Mead has picked up 30.5 sacks and 772 tackles. View a list of Prep sports and high school teams we cover.WASHINGTON — Donald Trump’s vision for education revolves around a single goal: to rid America’s schools of perceived “wokeness” and “left-wing indoctrination.” The president-elect wants to forbid classroom lessons on gender identity and structural racism. He wants to abolish diversity and inclusion offices. He wants to keep transgender athletes out of girls’ sports. Throughout his campaign, the Republican depicted schools as a political battleground to be won back from the left. Now that he’s won the White House, he plans to use federal money as leverage to advance his vision of education across the nation. Trump’s education plan pledges to cut funding for schools that defy him on a multitude of issues. On his first day in office, Trump has repeatedly said he will cut money to “any school pushing critical race theory, transgender insanity, and other inappropriate racial, sexual or political content on our children.” On the campaign trail, Trump said he would “not give one penny” to schools with vaccine or mask requirements. He said it would be done through executive action, though even some of his supporters say he lacks the authority to make such swift and sweeping changes. Get local news delivered to your inbox!

PUNE Raghunath Mashelkar, known for his scientific research, received the 50th honorary doctorate during the 8th Convocation of the Academy of Scientific and Industrial Research at the hands of Dr Jitendra Singh, India’s Minister of Science and Technology and Minister of Earth Sciences. This follows on the heels of his recent 49th honorary doctorate from Deakin University, Australia. With this, Mashelkar passed the record held by any Engineer in India, namely that of 48 Honorary Doctorates received by the late Dr APJ Abdul Kalam, a release from his office stated. Mashelkar has previously served as director general of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Vidita Ghatkar and Mrudula Survase clinch singles titles PUNE Vidita Ghatkar of SPM English School and Mrudula Survase of Elpro International School, Chinchwad, dominated table tennis action in inter school competition Sports For All (SFA ) Championships 2024 here to clinch the girls U-12 and U-15 singles titles. In the U-12 girls final, Vidita defeated Spruha Borgaonkar of Symbiosis School while Mrudula got the better of St Mary’s School’s Shreya Kothari in the U-15 summit clash. The SFA Championships 2024 have brought a thrilling lineup of 22 sports to Pune for the third edition. In the girls U-17 category, Shreya Gaikwad of Dev Public School bagged the gold medal with Nibha Kirkale of City International taking home the silver. Raksha Gele of Jaywant Public School bagged the gold medal in girls U-10 category,None

None

Supreme Court to weigh bans on puberty blockers, hormones for trans teensPNC Financial Services Group Inc. lifted its stake in shares of Baker Hughes ( NASDAQ:BKR – Free Report ) by 13.0% during the third quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 134,735 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 15,477 shares during the period. PNC Financial Services Group Inc.’s holdings in Baker Hughes were worth $4,871,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period. A number of other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also modified their holdings of BKR. Ashton Thomas Securities LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Baker Hughes during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $30,000. New Covenant Trust Company N.A. acquired a new stake in Baker Hughes during the 1st quarter worth $34,000. Alta Advisers Ltd bought a new stake in shares of Baker Hughes during the 2nd quarter valued at $42,000. Headlands Technologies LLC bought a new position in shares of Baker Hughes in the 2nd quarter worth $48,000. Finally, Quarry LP grew its stake in shares of Baker Hughes by 81.1% during the second quarter. Quarry LP now owns 1,594 shares of the company’s stock worth $56,000 after purchasing an additional 714 shares during the period. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 92.06% of the company’s stock. Baker Hughes Trading Down 1.4 % Shares of NASDAQ:BKR opened at $44.25 on Friday. The company has a 50-day simple moving average of $38.54 and a 200 day simple moving average of $35.63. The company has a market capitalization of $43.79 billion, a P/E ratio of 19.84, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.76 and a beta of 1.38. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37, a quick ratio of 0.88 and a current ratio of 1.30. Baker Hughes has a 52-week low of $28.32 and a 52-week high of $45.17. Baker Hughes Dividend Announcement The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, November 14th. Shareholders of record on Monday, November 4th were issued a $0.21 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Monday, November 4th. This represents a $0.84 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.90%. Baker Hughes’s dividend payout ratio is currently 37.67%. Analysts Set New Price Targets A number of equities analysts have issued reports on the company. Susquehanna raised their target price on Baker Hughes from $46.00 to $48.00 and gave the stock a “positive” rating in a report on Thursday, October 24th. Stifel Nicolaus boosted their price objective on shares of Baker Hughes from $40.00 to $45.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, July 29th. Morgan Stanley increased their target price on shares of Baker Hughes from $42.00 to $45.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Thursday, October 3rd. Royal Bank of Canada reissued an “outperform” rating and issued a $43.00 price target on shares of Baker Hughes in a report on Thursday, October 24th. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company raised Baker Hughes from an “equal weight” rating to an “overweight” rating and raised their price objective for the stock from $40.00 to $42.00 in a research note on Wednesday, September 25th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and seventeen have given a buy rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat, the company currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $44.59. View Our Latest Stock Analysis on Baker Hughes About Baker Hughes ( Free Report ) Baker Hughes Company provides a portfolio of technologies and services to energy and industrial value chain worldwide. The company operates through Oilfield Services & Equipment (OFSE) and Industrial & Energy Technology (IET) segments. The OFSE segment designs and manufactures products and provides related services, including exploration, appraisal, development, production, rejuvenation, and decommissioning for onshore and offshore oilfield operations. Featured Stories Want to see what other hedge funds are holding BKR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Baker Hughes ( NASDAQ:BKR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Baker Hughes Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Baker Hughes and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .As we gathered this Thanksgiving, it was easy to take abundance for granted. Leftovers are practically guaranteed. It wasn’t always this way. For most of history, there were no Thanksgiving feasts. Hunger, if not starvation, was the norm. Today, supermarkets are stocked with exotic foods from all over the world. Most of it is more affordable than ever. Even after President Joe Biden’s 8% inflation, Americans spend less than 12% of our income on food, half of what they spent 100 years ago. Why? Because free markets happened. Capitalism happened. When there is rule of law and private property, and people feel secure that no thief or government will take their property, farmers find new ways to grow more on less land. Greedy entrepreneurs lower costs and deliver goods faster. Consumers have better options. Yet today many Americans trash capitalism, demanding government “fixes” to make sure everyone gets equal amounts of this and that. But it’s in countries with the most government intervention where there are empty store shelves and hungrier people. In socialist Venezuela, affordable food is hard to find. In Cuba, government was going to make everything plentiful. But people suffered so much that, to prevent starvation, the Castros broke from communist principles and rented out state-owned land to private capitalists. Millions still go hungry around the world. The cause is rarely drought or “income inequality” or colonialism, but government control. Corruption, tariffs, political self-dealing and short-sighted regulations block food from reaching those who need it most. Last week, we celebrated the Pilgrims, who learned this lesson the hard way. When they first landed in America, they tried communal living. The harvest was shared equally. That seemed fair. But it failed miserably. A few Pilgrims worked hard, but others didn’t, claiming “weakness and inability,” as William Bradford, the governor of the colony, put it. They nearly starved. Desperate, Bradford tried another approach. “Every family,” he wrote, “was assigned a parcel of land.” Private property! Capitalism! Suddenly, more pilgrims worked hard. Of course they did. Now they got to keep what they made. Bradford wrote, “It made all hands very industrious.” He spelled out the lesson “The failure of this experiment of communal service, which was tried for several years, and by good and honest men proves the emptiness of the theory ... taking away of private property, and the possession of it in community ... would make a state happy and flourishing.” Fast forward 400 years, and many Americans have forgotten what Bradford learned. I see why socialism is popular. The idea of one big, harmonious collective feels good. But it brings disaster. Family dinners already have plenty of disagreements — children fight; adults bicker. Imagine what that would be like among millions of strangers. Collectivist systems encourage dependency, stifle initiative and waste resources. The same communal conceit that nearly starved the Pilgrims destroyed lives in the Soviet Union and led to mass starvation in China. When everyone is forced into the same plan, most people will take as much as they can and produce as little as they can get away with. Economists call it the “tragedy of the commons” referring to a common plot of land, controlled by, say, sheep owners. Each has an incentive to breed more sheep, which then eat the common’s grass until all of it is gone, and everyone goes hungry. Only when the commons is divided into private property does each owner agree to limit his herd’s grazing so there will be enough for his sheep to eat tomorrow. These same principles apply to many aspects of our lives: We thrive when individuals have a deed to their property and are confident that they can keep what they create. Then they create more. That’s what the Pilgrims learned: Incentives matter. Capitalist ownership is what creates American abundance. Every Thanksgiving, I’m thankful for free markets and private property. They are the ingredients of prosperity.